mouse melanoma cell line b16f10 luc2 Search Results


99
ATCC cell cultures b16 f10
Cell Cultures B16 F10, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/B16-F10/10__7554_slash_elife__54659-239-226-234
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell cultures b16 f10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC b16 f10 luc2
B16 F10 Luc2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/B16/pm40500332-281-13-17
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b16 f10 luc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ATCC 6475 luc2
6475 Luc2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/B16-F10-Luc2/pmc12490228-160-6-4
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
6475 luc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC b16f10 crl 6475 cells
CPMV particles show immunoprophylaxis in C57BL/6J mice challenged i.v. with <t>B16F10</t> melanoma or 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells. a) Schematic and timeline of the B16F10 prophylaxis study. b) Harvested lungs were fixed and imaged before manual tumor counting. c) Quantitative analysis of the number of tumor nodules found on the surface of the lungs. The + sign indicates the mean while the solid horizontal line indicates the median. d) Repeated B16F10 prophylactic immunotherapy study including an H6 peptide only control. The middle line indicates the mean number of tumor nodules. e) H&E images of the harvested lungs. The dark purple spots are indicative of the B16F10 tumor nodules in the lungs. f) Quantitative analysis of the H&E pictures in e). The ratio of tumor cells to total cells within the H&E images were plotted. The images were analyzed using QuPath software. g) Schematic and timeline of the 4T1‐Luc prophylaxis study. h) Harvested lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution before manual tumor counting. The tumor nodules are highlighted by the red arrows. i) Quantitative analysis of the tumor nodules from the lungs in h). All B16F10 experiments had a sample size of n = 4–5 while 4T1‐Luc experiments were accomplished with a sample size of n = 4. All analyses were done by one‐way ANOVA, and significance was deemed as p < 0.05.* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.
B16f10 Crl 6475 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/4T1-Luc2/pmc08564454-242-4-10
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b16f10 crl 6475 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

4t1  (ATCC)
99
ATCC 4t1
CPMV particles show immunoprophylaxis in C57BL/6J mice challenged i.v. with <t>B16F10</t> melanoma or 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells. a) Schematic and timeline of the B16F10 prophylaxis study. b) Harvested lungs were fixed and imaged before manual tumor counting. c) Quantitative analysis of the number of tumor nodules found on the surface of the lungs. The + sign indicates the mean while the solid horizontal line indicates the median. d) Repeated B16F10 prophylactic immunotherapy study including an H6 peptide only control. The middle line indicates the mean number of tumor nodules. e) H&E images of the harvested lungs. The dark purple spots are indicative of the B16F10 tumor nodules in the lungs. f) Quantitative analysis of the H&E pictures in e). The ratio of tumor cells to total cells within the H&E images were plotted. The images were analyzed using QuPath software. g) Schematic and timeline of the 4T1‐Luc prophylaxis study. h) Harvested lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution before manual tumor counting. The tumor nodules are highlighted by the red arrows. i) Quantitative analysis of the tumor nodules from the lungs in h). All B16F10 experiments had a sample size of n = 4–5 while 4T1‐Luc experiments were accomplished with a sample size of n = 4. All analyses were done by one‐way ANOVA, and significance was deemed as p < 0.05.* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.
4t1, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/4T1/custom%40crl-2539%4032497150
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
4t1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

ll/2  (ATCC)
99
ATCC ll/2
CPMV particles show immunoprophylaxis in C57BL/6J mice challenged i.v. with <t>B16F10</t> melanoma or 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells. a) Schematic and timeline of the B16F10 prophylaxis study. b) Harvested lungs were fixed and imaged before manual tumor counting. c) Quantitative analysis of the number of tumor nodules found on the surface of the lungs. The + sign indicates the mean while the solid horizontal line indicates the median. d) Repeated B16F10 prophylactic immunotherapy study including an H6 peptide only control. The middle line indicates the mean number of tumor nodules. e) H&E images of the harvested lungs. The dark purple spots are indicative of the B16F10 tumor nodules in the lungs. f) Quantitative analysis of the H&E pictures in e). The ratio of tumor cells to total cells within the H&E images were plotted. The images were analyzed using QuPath software. g) Schematic and timeline of the 4T1‐Luc prophylaxis study. h) Harvested lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution before manual tumor counting. The tumor nodules are highlighted by the red arrows. i) Quantitative analysis of the tumor nodules from the lungs in h). All B16F10 experiments had a sample size of n = 4–5 while 4T1‐Luc experiments were accomplished with a sample size of n = 4. All analyses were done by one‐way ANOVA, and significance was deemed as p < 0.05.* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.
Ll/2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/LL%2F2/custom%40crl-1642%4032497150
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ll/2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

el4  (ATCC)
97
ATCC el4
CPMV particles show immunoprophylaxis in C57BL/6J mice challenged i.v. with <t>B16F10</t> melanoma or 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells. a) Schematic and timeline of the B16F10 prophylaxis study. b) Harvested lungs were fixed and imaged before manual tumor counting. c) Quantitative analysis of the number of tumor nodules found on the surface of the lungs. The + sign indicates the mean while the solid horizontal line indicates the median. d) Repeated B16F10 prophylactic immunotherapy study including an H6 peptide only control. The middle line indicates the mean number of tumor nodules. e) H&E images of the harvested lungs. The dark purple spots are indicative of the B16F10 tumor nodules in the lungs. f) Quantitative analysis of the H&E pictures in e). The ratio of tumor cells to total cells within the H&E images were plotted. The images were analyzed using QuPath software. g) Schematic and timeline of the 4T1‐Luc prophylaxis study. h) Harvested lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution before manual tumor counting. The tumor nodules are highlighted by the red arrows. i) Quantitative analysis of the tumor nodules from the lungs in h). All B16F10 experiments had a sample size of n = 4–5 while 4T1‐Luc experiments were accomplished with a sample size of n = 4. All analyses were done by one‐way ANOVA, and significance was deemed as p < 0.05.* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.
El4, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/EL4/custom%40tib-39%4034142056
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
el4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson matrigel basement membrane matrix
CPMV particles show immunoprophylaxis in C57BL/6J mice challenged i.v. with <t>B16F10</t> melanoma or 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells. a) Schematic and timeline of the B16F10 prophylaxis study. b) Harvested lungs were fixed and imaged before manual tumor counting. c) Quantitative analysis of the number of tumor nodules found on the surface of the lungs. The + sign indicates the mean while the solid horizontal line indicates the median. d) Repeated B16F10 prophylactic immunotherapy study including an H6 peptide only control. The middle line indicates the mean number of tumor nodules. e) H&E images of the harvested lungs. The dark purple spots are indicative of the B16F10 tumor nodules in the lungs. f) Quantitative analysis of the H&E pictures in e). The ratio of tumor cells to total cells within the H&E images were plotted. The images were analyzed using QuPath software. g) Schematic and timeline of the 4T1‐Luc prophylaxis study. h) Harvested lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution before manual tumor counting. The tumor nodules are highlighted by the red arrows. i) Quantitative analysis of the tumor nodules from the lungs in h). All B16F10 experiments had a sample size of n = 4–5 while 4T1‐Luc experiments were accomplished with a sample size of n = 4. All analyses were done by one‐way ANOVA, and significance was deemed as p < 0.05.* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.
Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/matrigel+basement+membrane+matrix/pmc06786495-608-59-63
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matrigel basement membrane matrix - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Taconic Biosciences ragn12 plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi strains
CPMV particles show immunoprophylaxis in C57BL/6J mice challenged i.v. with <t>B16F10</t> melanoma or 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells. a) Schematic and timeline of the B16F10 prophylaxis study. b) Harvested lungs were fixed and imaged before manual tumor counting. c) Quantitative analysis of the number of tumor nodules found on the surface of the lungs. The + sign indicates the mean while the solid horizontal line indicates the median. d) Repeated B16F10 prophylactic immunotherapy study including an H6 peptide only control. The middle line indicates the mean number of tumor nodules. e) H&E images of the harvested lungs. The dark purple spots are indicative of the B16F10 tumor nodules in the lungs. f) Quantitative analysis of the H&E pictures in e). The ratio of tumor cells to total cells within the H&E images were plotted. The images were analyzed using QuPath software. g) Schematic and timeline of the 4T1‐Luc prophylaxis study. h) Harvested lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution before manual tumor counting. The tumor nodules are highlighted by the red arrows. i) Quantitative analysis of the tumor nodules from the lungs in h). All B16F10 experiments had a sample size of n = 4–5 while 4T1‐Luc experiments were accomplished with a sample size of n = 4. All analyses were done by one‐way ANOVA, and significance was deemed as p < 0.05.* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.
Ragn12 Plasmodium Chabaudi Chabaudi Strains, supplied by Taconic Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/Rag2+-+Model+RAGN12/pm38499786-288-65-63
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ragn12 plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi strains - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Caliper Life Sciences mouse breast cancer cell line
Abundance of immune cells and <t>tumor</t> inflammation signature in <t>tumors</t> from <t>mice</t> treated with KHK2455, anti–PD-L1 antibody, or their combination. The heatmap displays the <t>cell</t> type scores for each immune cell ( A ) and the expression levels for each gene in the TIS ( C ). Tumor specimens with similar cell type or gene expression profiles were clustered using the Ward’s method. The color scale represents the level of the cell type scores or gene expression, with red indicating higher scores/expression levels. B , D The dots represent individual tumors, and the bars indicate the mean values (n = 7/group). Differences in each cell type score and TIS between the combination and anti–PD-L1 groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. DC, dendritic cell; NK, natural killer; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; Th1, T-helper cell type 1; TIS, tumor inflammation signature
Mouse Breast Cancer Cell Line, supplied by Caliper Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/7+bladder+cancer+cell+human+ku+line/pmc12717313-27-1-8
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse breast cancer cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences dmem
Abundance of immune cells and <t>tumor</t> inflammation signature in <t>tumors</t> from <t>mice</t> treated with KHK2455, anti–PD-L1 antibody, or their combination. The heatmap displays the <t>cell</t> type scores for each immune cell ( A ) and the expression levels for each gene in the TIS ( C ). Tumor specimens with similar cell type or gene expression profiles were clustered using the Ward’s method. The color scale represents the level of the cell type scores or gene expression, with red indicating higher scores/expression levels. B , D The dots represent individual tumors, and the bars indicate the mean values (n = 7/group). Differences in each cell type score and TIS between the combination and anti–PD-L1 groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. DC, dendritic cell; NK, natural killer; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; Th1, T-helper cell type 1; TIS, tumor inflammation signature
Dmem, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/dmem/pmc09997082-232-21-22
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dmem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Corning Life Sciences growth factor reduced and phenol red free matrigel
Abundance of immune cells and <t>tumor</t> inflammation signature in <t>tumors</t> from <t>mice</t> treated with KHK2455, anti–PD-L1 antibody, or their combination. The heatmap displays the <t>cell</t> type scores for each immune cell ( A ) and the expression levels for each gene in the TIS ( C ). Tumor specimens with similar cell type or gene expression profiles were clustered using the Ward’s method. The color scale represents the level of the cell type scores or gene expression, with red indicating higher scores/expression levels. B , D The dots represent individual tumors, and the bars indicate the mean values (n = 7/group). Differences in each cell type score and TIS between the combination and anti–PD-L1 groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. DC, dendritic cell; NK, natural killer; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; Th1, T-helper cell type 1; TIS, tumor inflammation signature
Growth Factor Reduced And Phenol Red Free Matrigel, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+melanoma+cell+line+b16f10+luc2/matrigel/10__1158_slash_1078___0432__ccr___16___2000-58-39-47
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
growth factor reduced and phenol red free matrigel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


CPMV particles show immunoprophylaxis in C57BL/6J mice challenged i.v. with B16F10 melanoma or 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells. a) Schematic and timeline of the B16F10 prophylaxis study. b) Harvested lungs were fixed and imaged before manual tumor counting. c) Quantitative analysis of the number of tumor nodules found on the surface of the lungs. The + sign indicates the mean while the solid horizontal line indicates the median. d) Repeated B16F10 prophylactic immunotherapy study including an H6 peptide only control. The middle line indicates the mean number of tumor nodules. e) H&E images of the harvested lungs. The dark purple spots are indicative of the B16F10 tumor nodules in the lungs. f) Quantitative analysis of the H&E pictures in e). The ratio of tumor cells to total cells within the H&E images were plotted. The images were analyzed using QuPath software. g) Schematic and timeline of the 4T1‐Luc prophylaxis study. h) Harvested lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution before manual tumor counting. The tumor nodules are highlighted by the red arrows. i) Quantitative analysis of the tumor nodules from the lungs in h). All B16F10 experiments had a sample size of n = 4–5 while 4T1‐Luc experiments were accomplished with a sample size of n = 4. All analyses were done by one‐way ANOVA, and significance was deemed as p < 0.05.* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: S100A9‐Targeted Cowpea Mosaic Virus as a Prophylactic and Therapeutic Immunotherapy against Metastatic Breast Cancer and Melanoma

doi: 10.1002/advs.202101796

Figure Lengend Snippet: CPMV particles show immunoprophylaxis in C57BL/6J mice challenged i.v. with B16F10 melanoma or 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells. a) Schematic and timeline of the B16F10 prophylaxis study. b) Harvested lungs were fixed and imaged before manual tumor counting. c) Quantitative analysis of the number of tumor nodules found on the surface of the lungs. The + sign indicates the mean while the solid horizontal line indicates the median. d) Repeated B16F10 prophylactic immunotherapy study including an H6 peptide only control. The middle line indicates the mean number of tumor nodules. e) H&E images of the harvested lungs. The dark purple spots are indicative of the B16F10 tumor nodules in the lungs. f) Quantitative analysis of the H&E pictures in e). The ratio of tumor cells to total cells within the H&E images were plotted. The images were analyzed using QuPath software. g) Schematic and timeline of the 4T1‐Luc prophylaxis study. h) Harvested lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution before manual tumor counting. The tumor nodules are highlighted by the red arrows. i) Quantitative analysis of the tumor nodules from the lungs in h). All B16F10 experiments had a sample size of n = 4–5 while 4T1‐Luc experiments were accomplished with a sample size of n = 4. All analyses were done by one‐way ANOVA, and significance was deemed as p < 0.05.* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.

Article Snippet: Mouse 4T1‐Luc (CRL‐2539‐LUC2) and B16F10 (CRL‐6475) cells were purchased from ATCC.

Techniques: Control, Software

S100A9‐targeted CPMV immunotherapy against lung metastasis from i.v. injected B16F10 melanoma and 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells in mice. a) Treatment schedule of the metastatic B16F10 melanoma model using C57BL/6J mice and therapeutic administration of CPMV and CPMV‐H6. b) Quantitative analysis of tumor nodules counted in lungs harvested post‐treatment. c) Treatment schedule of the metastatic 4T1‐Luc breast cancer model using Balb/c mice. d) Quantitative luminescence of the tumors following region of interest (ROI) measurements of the images from (e). e) Luminescent imaging of the 4T1‐Luc tumors taken on the IVIS. The mice were imaged every two days following 150 mg kg −1 i.p. injection of D‐luciferin, and the luminescence was calculated using ROI measurements from the Living Image 3.0 software. One representative image taken on the IVIS on day 9 is shown. For B16F10 experiments an n = 7–12 animals per group and for the 4T1‐Luc experiments an n = 5 animals per group were assigned. Statistical significance was characterized as p < 0.05. All analyses were done by either one or two‐way ANOVA. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: S100A9‐Targeted Cowpea Mosaic Virus as a Prophylactic and Therapeutic Immunotherapy against Metastatic Breast Cancer and Melanoma

doi: 10.1002/advs.202101796

Figure Lengend Snippet: S100A9‐targeted CPMV immunotherapy against lung metastasis from i.v. injected B16F10 melanoma and 4T1‐Luc breast cancer cells in mice. a) Treatment schedule of the metastatic B16F10 melanoma model using C57BL/6J mice and therapeutic administration of CPMV and CPMV‐H6. b) Quantitative analysis of tumor nodules counted in lungs harvested post‐treatment. c) Treatment schedule of the metastatic 4T1‐Luc breast cancer model using Balb/c mice. d) Quantitative luminescence of the tumors following region of interest (ROI) measurements of the images from (e). e) Luminescent imaging of the 4T1‐Luc tumors taken on the IVIS. The mice were imaged every two days following 150 mg kg −1 i.p. injection of D‐luciferin, and the luminescence was calculated using ROI measurements from the Living Image 3.0 software. One representative image taken on the IVIS on day 9 is shown. For B16F10 experiments an n = 7–12 animals per group and for the 4T1‐Luc experiments an n = 5 animals per group were assigned. Statistical significance was characterized as p < 0.05. All analyses were done by either one or two‐way ANOVA. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, ns = not significant. The image of the mouse is created with BioRender.com.

Article Snippet: Mouse 4T1‐Luc (CRL‐2539‐LUC2) and B16F10 (CRL‐6475) cells were purchased from ATCC.

Techniques: Injection, Quantitative Luminescence, Imaging, Software

Abundance of immune cells and tumor inflammation signature in tumors from mice treated with KHK2455, anti–PD-L1 antibody, or their combination. The heatmap displays the cell type scores for each immune cell ( A ) and the expression levels for each gene in the TIS ( C ). Tumor specimens with similar cell type or gene expression profiles were clustered using the Ward’s method. The color scale represents the level of the cell type scores or gene expression, with red indicating higher scores/expression levels. B , D The dots represent individual tumors, and the bars indicate the mean values (n = 7/group). Differences in each cell type score and TIS between the combination and anti–PD-L1 groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. DC, dendritic cell; NK, natural killer; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; Th1, T-helper cell type 1; TIS, tumor inflammation signature

Journal: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII

Article Title: A selective IDO1 inhibitor, KHK2455, improves efficacy of PD-L1 blockade by modulating both innate and adaptive immunity in a mouse melanoma model

doi: 10.1007/s00262-025-04232-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Abundance of immune cells and tumor inflammation signature in tumors from mice treated with KHK2455, anti–PD-L1 antibody, or their combination. The heatmap displays the cell type scores for each immune cell ( A ) and the expression levels for each gene in the TIS ( C ). Tumor specimens with similar cell type or gene expression profiles were clustered using the Ward’s method. The color scale represents the level of the cell type scores or gene expression, with red indicating higher scores/expression levels. B , D The dots represent individual tumors, and the bars indicate the mean values (n = 7/group). Differences in each cell type score and TIS between the combination and anti–PD-L1 groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. DC, dendritic cell; NK, natural killer; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; Th1, T-helper cell type 1; TIS, tumor inflammation signature

Article Snippet: A mouse breast cancer cell line, 4T1-Luc2 cells (Caliper Life Sciences), a mouse pancreatic cancer cell line, PAN 02 cells (National Cancer Institute (NCI) Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) Tumor Repository), and a mouse melanoma cell line, B16-F10-Luc cells (gifted from Takashi Murakami, Saitama Medical University), were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10 vol% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Life Technologies).

Techniques: Expressing, Gene Expression